You might be surprised to know that I don’t review everything I taste, or drink for that matter. The cause of this is normally laziness on my part, but sometimes it is just inopportune timing; I mean I do have trouble talking and writing notes at the same time. So if we are out and about, or entertaining at home I don’t lift a pen. Oh, I also don’t like writing reviews based upon in-store tastings, situations where you get a thimble full of wine and 1 minute to make an assessment. Anyway, the idea for odds and ends to do give a brief impression of wines tasted over the past week that didn’t get a full review. Not sure if this will be interesting or relevant or useful, but I’ll give it a go for a while and see if it floats.
I got a case of the Jack Mattinson’s Deluxe Dry Red 2009 from the Mountain X website for $150, and the first bottle was a honest Shiraz Cabernet blend, medium bodied and quite tidy, but really needs another 6 months in the bottle. I also have a bottle of Seppelt Grand Muscat on the kitchen bench that I occassionally get a sip from. Quite a nice wine, but perhaps a little syrupy. I also just finished my case of Meerea Park “The Aunts” Shiraz 2003, and after worrying that it was falling over a bit, the last bottle turned out to be a cracker. Such are the vagaries of cork. During the week, I also snuck in a bottle of the Louis Tete Beaujolais Fleurie “La Bonne Dame” 2005 that was a bit stinky on the nose, with strawberries, a touch of bubblegum, and a light palate that looked a bit bleak without food.
The week also presented the opportunity to taste the new Balnaves wines, with Doug Balnaves in attendence. I thought it was a solid range of wines, perhaps reflecting a strong vintage in the Coonawarra for 2008. As you would expect, the Tally was a very big and high quality wine, but I don’t think the cheaper wines should be ignored by any means, particularly the Blend. I also asked Doug about the absence of a Shiraz/Cabernet blend in the range, and he said it was never something that they’d considered making.
The weekend presented a swag of good wines, the highlights being Bouchard Pere et Fils Meursault “Les Perrieres” 1er cru 2006 which was stunning with delicious fruits and concentration and finesse, a Vietti Barolo Castiglione 2006 that showed ferocious tannins initially, but settled somewhat after 3 or 4 hours in a decanter. Tough work now but showing promise. Next was a bottle of the Bouchard Pere et Fils Beaune “Greves – Vigne de l’Enfant Jesus” 1er cru 2004 which was an excellent wine, and particularly surprising considering the ill regard for the 2004 vineyard in Burgundy. Lastly, a bottle of Wendouree Shiraz Mataro 1998 which was youthful and powerful, but showed that menthol/camphor/eucalypt character I don’t particularly like. Oh, there was also a particularly nice bottle of Château La Nerthe Châteauneuf-du-Pape, but I cannot remember the vintage.
Thanks for the updates – like the rambling notes by the way. I sometimes think the more detailed descriptors used often the less I can imagine the wine myself.
wierd thing- I too tried the 2006 Bouchard Perriere and it is a most tidy wine …..
Nice idea to fill in the gaps with some quick impressions, Perry. Noicey Noice!
Admit it Linc, you secretly love Wendouree
The La Nerthe was quite good really. Really good.
hey tannin, what year was the La Nerthe?
ummm.maybe wizz knows..
It was a 2000.
I wasn’t even there but I know this.
wow – your telepathic skills are excellent….. I think….
I knew you would know. I was there but not “totally”
Good Wine that 2000.
Would you like the tasting note as well?
Do you have one??
Does that matter?
Ha ha- I enjoyed it but can’t remember it too well